Cases 41 - 50 of 236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Clifford et al v. Federman et al
as 1:2018cv01953
Defendant:
Maandi Media Productions Digital LLC, Business Consulting, LLC, Maandi Entertainment LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Clifford, Kasolas Family & Friends VG Investment, LLC, Scott Clifford and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00085
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shaw v. Smith
as 1:2021cv03137
Petitioner:
Antonio Shaw
Respondent:
Tamarsha Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv03082
Plaintiff:
Von King, Danielle Johnson, Gereline Thompson and others
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Georgia Department of Labor and Commissioner Mark Butler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Carson et al
as 4:2021cv00204
Plaintiff:
Jack Ivan Shaw
Defendant:
Kerry Carson, T. Carter, C. Barella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Byrd v. Coffee County Board of Commissioners et al
as 5:2021cv00043
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Byrd and Dwayne Simpson
Defendant:
Coffee County Board of Commissioners, Doyle Wooten, Fred Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHAW v. PEACH COUNTY et al
as 5:2021cv00145
Defendant:
BRANDON WILLIAMS, PEACH COUNTY, KENNY CAMERON and others
Plaintiff:
LONNIE RUSSELL SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Ward et al
as 4:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Robert Toole, Cedric Taylor, Timothy Ward and others
Plaintiff:
Dexter Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw et al v. Chatham County Detention Center et al
as 4:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Chatham County Detention Center, Sheriff John Wilcher, Dr. Vlasenko and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Kirkland, Michael Green, Rashad Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
