Cases 41 - 50 of 1,681
Erby v. State of TN et al
as 2:2024cv02732
Defendant:
State of TN and Shelby County Health Department
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gibson v. Shelby County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2024cv02738
Defendant:
Bailiff Rubio Philps, Chief Rudd, Sgt. Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2024cv02600
Plaintiff:
Ester Moore
Defendant:
Bobby Grandberry, Shelby County Government, Wanda Halbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Knox v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2024cv02719
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail
Plaintiff:
Jarquarious Knox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ratliff v. Shelby County Justice Center
as 2:2024cv02702
Respondent:
Shelby County Justice Center
Petitioner:
James D. Ratliff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Erby v. Edwards et al
as 2:2024cv02705
Defendant:
Lt C. Edwards, Captain E. Andrews, Shelby County and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of Tennessee et al
as 2:2024cv02711
Defendant:
Mark Berryhill, Floyd Bonner, Shelby County, TN and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. State of TN et al
as 2:2024cv02713
Defendant:
Shelby County, TN, R. Hubbard, Officer Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Erby v. Harris et al
as 2:2024cv02714
Defendant:
SCSO Jail Division, C. Edwards, State of TN and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Erby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wing v. Shelby County Jail
as 2:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wing
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
