Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Johnson et al v. Fresenius Medical Care Holdings ,Inc., et al
as 1:2014cv10443
Plaintiff:
Clyde Johnson and Inja Simmons
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Holdings ,Inc., Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. d/b/a/ Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simmons v. Ryan
as 1:2013cv10566
Petitioner:
Gerald Simmons
Respondent:
Kelly Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patel v. Holder et al
as 1:2012cv11827
Plaintiff:
Ankitaben Patel
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jr., Hila Solis, Seth D. Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Simmons v. Grondolsky
as 1:2012cv10515
Petitioner:
Antonio T. Simmons
Respondent:
J. Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simmons et al v. Royce et al
as 1:2011cv11441
Plaintiff:
Marie Fe Simmons and William J Simmons, Sr.
Defendant:
Celeste S Royce and Seacoast Affiliated Group Practice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv10708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson-Simmons v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA et al
as 1:2011cv10285
Plaintiff:
Susan Robinson-Simmons
Defendant:
Hampton Bay Mortgage Co., Inc. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Simmons v. Roden et al
as 3:2010cv30066
Plaintiff:
Paul Simmons
Defendant:
Gary Roden, Christine Hillman, Donald V. Giancioppo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Simmons v. Union Security Insurance Company
as 1:2010cv10547
Plaintiff:
Thomas Simmons
Defendant:
Union Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Ronald Peden v. Robert Healy, et al
as 1:2009cv10851
Plaintiff:
Ronald Peden
Defendant:
Robert Healy, Annette Rodibaugh and E. Denise Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
