Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Criswell et al v. Mobile Housing Board
as 1:2014cv00447
Plaintiff:
Ty Criswell , Ronald Coffman , Eric Knight and others
Defendant:
Mobile Housing Board
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Smiley v. Circuit Court for Mobile County, Alabama et al
as 1:2014cv00404
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Bernard Smiley
Defendant:
Circuit Court for Mobile County, Alabama, Michael Youngpeter, Charlie McKnight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00855
Plaintiff:
Curtis Edward Nelson
Defendant:
Kenneth L. Jones, Sandra Y. Giles, Robert Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melson v. Morgan County DHR et al
as 5:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
Van Wayne Melson
Defendant:
Morgan County DHR, Jennifer Howell, Michael Wilhelm and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. Mason, et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00370
Plaintiff:
Richard Kyle Reeves
Defendant:
Rene Mason, Tyrone Jenkins, L. White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Frazier et al (INMATE 1)CONSENT
as 2:2012cv00953
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jackson
Defendant:
Gelet Frazier , Cedric Long , Virgil Smiley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tigner v. Sparks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00954
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Tigner
Defendant:
Ms. Sparks, Danny Gould, Officer Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Smiley v. Carter
as 5:2011cv01668
Plaintiff:
Jimmy L Smiley
Defendant:
Bettinna Carter
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
