Cases 41 - 50 of 144
McCormick et al v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Domestic Division et al
as 2:2019cv03329
Defendant:
Catherine White, Hsiu-Chen Lu, Columbus Division of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Moses McCormick and Mark McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yates v. City of Barberton, Ohio et al
as 5:2019cv01504
Defendant:
City of Barberton, Ohio, Barberton Fire Department and Summit County Board of Education
Plaintiff:
Samuel Darnell Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ross v. Summit County Court of Common Pleas et al
as 5:2019cv00757
Defendant:
Jeff Layborn, State of Ohio, Judge Jill Flagg Lanzinger and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Ray Ross, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coker v. Summit County Common Pleas
as 5:2019cv00474
Plaintiff:
Marcus Alfred Coker
Defendant:
Summit County Common Pleas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02975
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv02402
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
City of Barberton et al v. Purdue Pharma, L.P., et al
as 1:2018op45767
Plaintiff:
Irving B. Sugerman, Brad Bryan, Valley Fire District and others
Defendant:
Anda, Inc., Mallinckrodt LLC, Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Filing Error
as 1:2018op45766
Plaintiff:
Village of Clinton, Village of Richfield, City of Fairlawn and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
City of Munroe Falls
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv01424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
