Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Handspike v. Tennessee Department of Correction et.al.
as 1:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Dion Handspike
Defendant:
State of Tennessee Attorney General, Tennessee Department of Correction, Bledsoe County Correctional Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kabba v. Williams et al
as 3:2016cv02718
Plaintiff:
Fanta Kabba
Defendant:
Raymond Williams, Jr. and Swift Transportation Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown et al v. Mohamed et al (PLR1)
as 1:2016cv00098
Plaintiff:
Peter Brown and Kathryn Brown
Defendant:
Hassan A. Mohamed, Swift Transportation Services, LLC and Esurance Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Webb et al
as 2:2016cv02055
Plaintiff:
Donyel Thomas
Defendant:
Webb, Swift, P. Echols and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Swift et al
as 2:2015cv02667
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Resa M. Swift and Tavious Swift
Defendant:
One 2006 Audi A8, VIN WAUML44E56N005385, with All Appurtenances and Attachments Thereon
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Swift v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2015cv01243
Plaintiff:
Shirley Swift
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Hartfield v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00953
Plaintiff:
Joseph H. Hartfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC and Joshua C. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Richardson v. Webb et al
as 2:2015cv02537
Plaintiff:
Stephan Richardson
Defendant:
Webb, Swift, Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyte v. Hinojos et al (JRG2)
as 2:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Kathy Kyte
Defendant:
Carlos Pena Hinojos and Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
