Cases
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv12110
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Quigley et al v. The Citigroup Supplemental Plan For Shearson Transfers et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv08944
Plaintiff: Daniel C. Quigley, William Hiden, Joseph F. Durso and others
Defendant: The Citigroup Supplemental Plan For Shearson Transfers and The Plan Administration Committee of Citigroup Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
LAWRENCE v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv90213
Plaintiff: DARRELL T. LAWRENCE, DARRELL T. LAWRENCE, CAROLYN SUE LAWRENCE and others
Defendant: U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
LAWRENCE v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., et al
as 2:2009cv89619
Plaintiff: DARRELL T. LAWRENCE and CAROLYN SUE LAWRENCE
Defendant: A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Type: Torts - Injury None
Lajerald Carr v. William Lawrence
as 09-1630
Petitioner: LAJERALD CARR
Respondent: WILLIAM T. LAWRENCE
David Danser v. William Lawrence
as 09-1549
Petitioner: DAVID K. DANSER
Respondent: WILLIAM T. LAWRENCE
Party-in-Interest: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Djigma v. Hillary S. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00079
Plaintiff: Ethel White Djigma
Defendant: Hillary S., L. T. Lawrence and Rae Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lampkin et al v. Lassiter et al
as 2:2007cv68978
Plaintiff: Jimmy D. Lampkin, Cecelia Lampkin, Gerald Landreth and others
Defendant: Ernest L. Lassiter, WILLIAM H. LEE and Betty Lemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?