Cases 41 - 50 of 1,651
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CARDWELL v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, DEPUTY TAYLOR, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. GURAL
as 2:2023cv04882
Plaintiff:
HOWARD TAYLOR
Defendant:
JEFFREY GURAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
CONEY et al v. SHOP RITE OF FRONT & OLNEY
as 2:2023cv04710
Plaintiff:
HOMER CONEY and Laureen Taylor-Coney
Defendant:
Shop Rite of Front & Olney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CATALDO v. THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
as 2:2023cv04554
Plaintiff:
TAYLOR CATALDO
Defendant:
THE PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
TAYLOR v. HALLER
as 2:2023cv01955
Plaintiff:
ASHLEIGH M. TAYLOR
Defendant:
ALEXANDER TOY HALLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MCMILLAN v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2023cv04078
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MCMILLAN
Defendant:
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, WARDEN CHERYL STEBERGER, PRIMECARE MEDICAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
