Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Bonds v. Fortner et al
as 3:2010cv00295
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Bonds
Respondent:
James Fortner and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonds v. Fortner et al
as 3:2010mc00040
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Bonds
Respondent:
James Fortner and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Lee v. Easterling et al
as 1:2010cv01030
Petitioner:
Kelvin Anthony Lee
Respondent:
Joseph Easterling, Robert E. Cooper, Jr. and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Easterling et al
as 3:2009cv00667
Petitioner:
Carvin L. Thomas
Respondent:
Joe Easterling and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nichols v. Morrow et al
as 1:2009cv00183
Petitioner:
Jeffery S Nichols
Respondent:
James Morrow and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Easterling et al
as 3:2009mc00146
Petitioner:
Carvin L. Thomas
Respondent:
Joe Easterling and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee
Wiltz v. Fortner et al
as 3:2009cv00296
Petitioner:
Ortega Wiltz
Respondent:
James Fortner and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Braxton v. Fortner et al
as 3:2008cv00497
Petitioner:
Michael T. Braxton
Respondent:
James Fortner and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Fortner et al
as 3:2008cv00274
Petitioner:
Kenneth D. Thomas
Respondent:
James Fortner and Attorney General for the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miles v. Bell et al
as 3:2007cv01098
Petitioner:
Joseph Miles
Respondent:
Ricky Bell and Attorney General of the State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
