Cases 41 - 50 of 593
Torres v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv01701
Petitioner:
Juan R. Torres
Respondent:
Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WHITE v. LT. CLAYTON et al
as 2:2022cv03867
Plaintiff:
WILLIE WHITE
Defendant:
LT. CLAYTON and OFFICER TORRES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TORRES v. PALISADES INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2022cv03442
Plaintiff:
MIGUELINA TORRES
Defendant:
PALISADES INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
SANTIAGO-TORRES v. THE KELLOGG COMPANY d/b/a KELLOGG'S et al
as 5:2022cv02875
Plaintiff:
AIXA MARIE SANTIAGO-TORRES
Defendant:
THE KELLOGG COMPANY doing business as KELLOGG'S and JOHN DOE
Cross Claimant:
THE KELLOGG COMPANY
3Rd Party Defendant:
RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PONGRACZ v. TREATMENT TRENDS, INC. et al
as 5:2022cv02535
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER J PONGRACZ
Defendant:
TREATMENT TRENDS, INC. doing business as KEENAN HOUSE, SHARON MOORE, JACK GOLDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00920
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
TORRES v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2022cv02283
Plaintiff:
ROBERT TORRES
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
torres
as 2:2022cv02281
Plaintiff:
robert torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
