Cases 41 - 50 of 213
KANE v. PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2020cv00647
Defendant:
PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and PA SCI-PHOENIX SUPERINTENDENT TAMMY FERGUSON
Plaintiff:
VINCENT KANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Junlous v. Ferguson et al
as 1:2020cv00155
Respondent:
Tammy Ferguson and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Petitioner:
Lagenza Junlous
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
MORALES v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2020cv00439
Plaintiff:
RUBEN MORALES
Defendant:
JOHN C. WETZEL, JOHN DOE (C.E.R.T.), TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PATTON v. FERGUSON
as 2:2020cv00069
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL and TAMMY FERGUSON
Petitioner:
NEAL L. PATTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PERSON v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2020cv00206
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and TAMMY FERGUSON
Petitioner:
DARIAN PERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OGELSBY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv05598
Petitioner:
LAMAR OGELSBY
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAYNARD v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2019cv05459
Defendant:
JERRY ANKROM, GENA CLARK, MICHAEL BURTON and others
Plaintiff:
HENRY BAYNARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YENGLEE v. LINK et al
as 2:2019cv05352
Respondent:
TAMMY FERGUSON, JOSEPH C. KORSZNIAK, CYNTHIA LINK and others
Petitioner:
KERPER YENGLEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEDINA v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2019cv04980
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, TAMMY FERGUSON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
ANTHONY MEDINA, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DADE v. FERGUSON
as 2:2019cv04718
Plaintiff:
LAMONT DADE
Defendant:
SUPERINT. TAMMY FERGUSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
