Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Pugh v. Elmore et al
as 1:2017cv04269
Plaintiff:
Anthony G. Pugh
Defendant:
Ann Elmore, John Lloyd, James Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarke v. Dozier et al
as 1:2017cv03803
Petitioner:
Jerome Clarke
Respondent:
Gregory C. Dozier, Antoine Caldwell, Terry E. Barnard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BAKER v. GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES et al
as 5:2017cv00263
Petitioner:
RODERICK DOUGLASS BAKER
Respondent:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E BARNARD, NATHAN DEAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Larry Givens v. State Board of Pardons and Par, et al
as 17-11765
Petitioner - Appellant:
LARRY GIVENS
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, TERRY E. BARNARD, Chairman, JAMES W. MILLS, Vice Chairman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00135
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Havron v. Watkins-Vinson et al
as 1:2017cv00831
Plaintiff:
Gerald William Havron
Defendant:
Courtney Watkins-Vinson, Stephen P. Morgan and Terry E. Barnard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aponte-Diaz v. Conley et al
as 1:2017cv00273
Plaintiff:
Angel Miliciades Aponte-Diaz
Defendant:
T. J. Conley, Attorney Generals Office and Terry E. Barnard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Givens v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2016cv04141
Petitioner:
Larry Givens
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles, Terry E. Barnard, James W. Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
OUTLAW v. OWENS et al
as 5:2016cv00456
Plaintiff:
CALVIN OUTLAW
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, TERRY E BARNARD, ALBERT MURRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Georgia Board of Pardons & Paroles et al
as 1:2016cv03229
Plaintiff:
Amber Danielle Evans
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons & Paroles, Terry E. Barnard and Rick Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
