Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Webb v. Family Court of the State of NY County of Westchester et al
as 1:2014cv00671
Plaintiff:
Stephen D. Webb
Defendant:
Family Court of the State of NY County of Westchester, David Klein, Esther R. Furman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. People of the State of NY
as 1:2013cv07592
Petitioner:
Rogezio Young
Respondent:
People of the State of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Inesti v. People of the State of NY
as 1:2013cv06351
Petitioner:
Mark Inesti
Respondent:
People of the State of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salvador v. Conviser et al
as 1:2013cv05402
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Salvador
Defendant:
Daniel Conviser and State of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Salvador v. Conviser et al
as 1:2013cv05442
Plaintiff:
Luis Antonio Salvador
Defendant:
Daniel Conviser and State of NY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Levesque v. State of NY et al
as 8:2013cv00825
Plaintiff:
Andre Levesque
Defendant:
State of NY, Clinton County Government Center, Town of Plattsburgh Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Justice v. City of NY et al
as 1:2013cv03319
Plaintiff:
Brenda Justice
Defendant:
City of NY, State of NY, ACS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Russ v. Darrell Chaver
as 13-1778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jamaal Russ, AKA Jamal Russ
Defendant - Appellee:
Darrell Chavers, AKA John Doe #1, John Doe #2, (Police Officer at 73 Pct.), John Doe #3, (Police Officer at 73 Pct.) and others
Biton v. Aventura et al
as 1:2012cv05426
Defendant:
ACLU, Aaronson Rapport Feinstein Deutch, Ann Friedfertig and others
Plaintiff:
Danielle Biton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
People of the State of NY v. Best
as 1:2012cv07021
Plaintiff:
People of the State of NY
Defendant:
Hilary Best
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
