Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 61
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv01802
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Robinson v. Goss et al
as 1:2012cv02580
Defendant: Perry D. Goss and Sygma Network, Inc.
Plaintiff: Tujuana D. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Chang Ping Li et al v. The Sygma Network, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv03389
Defendant: Does, Ronald Gerald Rodgers and The Sygma Network, Inc.
Plaintiff: Chang Ping Li and J. Y.
Caiazzo v. Faxon et al
as 1:2012cv01114
Plaintiff: Constance Caiazzo
Defendant: Scott Anthony Faxon and Sygma Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv04438
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Hall v. Sysco Corporation, et al
as 4:2011cv00647
Plaintiff: Betty Hall
Defendant: Sysco Corporation and The Sygma Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HELMS et al v. MOWERY et al
as 3:2011cv01054
Plaintiff: BARBARA A. HELMS and CHESTER L. HELMS
Defendant: BRIAN K. MOWERY, THE SYGMA NETWORK, INC. and JOHN DOE (1-10)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Guzman v. The Sygma Network, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00620
Plaintiff: Jason Guzman
Defendant: Justin T. Maurice and The Sygma Network, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
NAWAZ et al v. WILLIS et al
as 3:2010cv06690
Plaintiff: TAJAMMUL NAWAZ , HUSNA JABEEN , FARAH QURAISHI and others
Defendant: STEVEN WILLIS and SYGMA NETWORK, INC.
Counter_claimant: SYGMA NETWORK, INC.
Counter_defendant: TAJAMMUL NAWAZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv01753
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?