Cases 41 - 50 of 10,080
THOMAS v. WELLPATH MEDICAL et al
as 2:2024cv03506
Defendant:
DR. TRACEY SHAWLEY, DR. BORA and WELLPATH MEDICAL
Plaintiff:
SHEKIR THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALSH v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv03363
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
PAUL THOMAS WALSH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
MILLER v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2024cv03297
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THOMAS MCGINLEY
Petitioner:
NATHANIEL MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANGROS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01058
Plaintiff:
THOMAS EDMUND ANGROS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bayarinas v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv01216
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Plaintiff:
Thomas Michael Bayarinas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HALL v. NISBET et al
as 2:2024cv03301
Defendant:
ABINGTON POLICE DEPARTMENT AND MUNICIPAL BUILDING, RAYMOND TOWNSEND, OSWALDO TOLEDO and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. UNITED STATES et al
as 5:2024cv03199
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Tammy J. Jones and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff:
Rachel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
THOMAS v. OLIVER
as 2:2024cv03084
Defendant:
ROBYN OLIVER
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Burton v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv01175
Defendant:
Christopher Brownwell, Wendy Nicholas, Linda Chismar and others
Plaintiff:
Niara Safiya Garcia Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
