Cases 41 - 50 of 48,874
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01965
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01966
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01970
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01968
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and THE BUDD COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01977
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, THE BUDD COMPANY, DR. MESHA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza-Guerra v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Garza Guerra
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
GOLDNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01868
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOLDNER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ARMSTRONG v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2024cv01912
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
LANCE-GEIGER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01855
Plaintiff:
MARGIE LANCE-GEIGER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7429 IRS: Tax Jeopardy Assessment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
