Cases 41 - 50 of 5,572
Turner v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00826
Petitioner:
Frederick Turner, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Boyd v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02482
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Marcus Boyd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00814
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Failure to make decision on naturalization petition
Ewing v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv02490
Petitioner:
Jerome Ewing
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. New Life Union Mission et al
as 1:2024cv01133
Garnishee:
New Life Union Mission
Defendant:
Tina Joy Bowlin
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Recovery of Debt to US
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01131
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Cutburth v. Atchley et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Defendant:
United States of America and Charles Atchley
Plaintiff:
Ronald W Cutburth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00765
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
