Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Statewide Bonding, Inc., et al v. DHS, et al
as 19-5178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Statewide Bonding, Inc., Mike Donovan, Nexus Services, Inc. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement, ICE, Jody M. Prescott, in his official capacity as Associate Legal Advisor, Office of the Principal Legal Advisor, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Ronald D. Vitiello, in his individual and official capacity as Deputy Director and Senior Official Performing the Duties of Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv03053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2493
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1895
Petitioner - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Churyumov v. United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) et al
as 8:2017cv00045
Plaintiff:
Oleg Churyumov
Defendant:
John F. Kelly, Donald Neufeld, Lori Scialabba and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2016cv62927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22571
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1105
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv61358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv21506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1105
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
