Cases 41 - 50 of 732
DOE 2 v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01303
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 2
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, 1
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOE 3 v. BUTLER UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 3
Defendant:
BUTLER UNIVERSITY, MICHAEL HOWELL and RALPH REIFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
BARYOH et al v. WATTS et al
as 1:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
MOSES BARYOH and INDIANA UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Defendant:
CHARLOTTE WATTS, AUSTIN MAGNUSS and INDIANA UNIVERSITY - BLOOMINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Allen v. Valparaiso University Law Clinic
as 2:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Mario Anthony Allen
Defendant:
Valparaiso University Law Clinic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ALLEN v. VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY LAW CLINIC
as 1:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
MARIO ANTHONY ALLEN
Defendant:
VALPARAISO UNIVERSITY LAW CLINIC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
