Cases 41 - 50 of 149
Mills v. Vanburen et al
as 2:2019cv01870
Plaintiff:
Derek Mills
Defendant:
Dr Maureen White, Crystal Marchant, Torria Vanburen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua VanBuren v. Doug Walker, et al
as 19-31028
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA JAMICHAEL VANBUREN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG WALKER and DANIEL HUNTER
Joshua VanBuren v. Doug Walker, et al
as 19-30859
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA JAMICHAEL VANBUREN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOUG WALKER and DANIEL HUNTER
Coil, Bobby v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2019cv00861
Defendant:
J. Doe #1, Kevin A. Carr, Dr. Torria M. VanBuren and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lee Coil
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv00975
Defendant:
Margaret Stochosky, Eileen Furman, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Virginia Smith and Carmelita Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Love v. Vanburen et al
as 2:2019cv01511
Defendant:
Joseph Beahm, Sgt York, Cheryl Jeanpierre and others
Plaintiff:
Deron Darnell Love
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VanBuren v. Walker et al
as 3:2019cv01153
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jamichael VanBuren
Defendant:
Daniel Hunter and Doug Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Beahm et al
as 2:2019cv00914
Defendant:
Joseph Beahm, Angela Kroll, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Bradley, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua VanBuren v. Raymond Spoon, et al
as 19-30402
Defendant / Appellee:
PAUL BLUNSCHI, Police Officer, West Monroe Police Department and RAYMOND M. SPOON, Police Officer, West Monroe Police Department
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA JAMICHAEL VANBUREN
Hoskins, Michael v. Wojtecka et al
as 3:2019cv00341
Undetermined:
WCI Prison Facility
Defendant:
Inmate Roxon Love, Dr. Wojtecka and Dr. Torria VanBuren
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Hoskins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
