Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Via Licensing Corporation v. Compal Electronics, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv01409
Plaintiff:
Via Licensing Corporation
Defendant:
Compal Electronics, Inc. and Auscom Engineering Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marley v. Via International, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00947
Defendant:
Via International, Inc., DSI Entertainment Systems, Inc. and Stearns Enterprises, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael J Marley
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Via Licensing Corporation v. Pegatron Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv04086
Plaintiff:
Via Licensing Corporation
Defendant:
Pegatron Corporation, Pegatron Technology Service Inc and Unihan Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Via Vadis, LLC et al v. Netgear, Inc.
as 3:2015cv03573
Plaintiff:
Via Vadis, LLC and AC Technologies, S.A.
Defendant:
Netgear Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Acorn Composite Corporation et al v. Via Overseas Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03098
Plaintiff:
Acorn Composite Corporation and ACT Linden LLC
Defendant:
Jianqiang Gu, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Via Overseas Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Omidi et al
as 2:2015cv00362
Movant:
Asset Management Irrevocable Trusts via Trustee Asiatrust Nevis Ltd, aka Asiatrust Ltd, Cindy Omidi and Property Care Insurance, Inc.
VIA Technologies, Inc. (a California corporation) et al v. ASUS Computer International et al
as 5:2014cv03586
Plaintiff:
VIA Technologies, Inc. (a California corporation) , VIA Technologies, Inc. (a Taiwan corporation) and VIA Labs, Inc.
Defendant:
ASUS Computer International, ASUSTEK Computer, Inc. and ASMEDIA Technology, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
