Cases 41 - 50 of 235
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hunter v. Wade et al
as 1:2022cv00474
Petitioner:
Otis Lee Hunter
Respondent:
Matthew Wade and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
David Lee Smith
Defendant:
Heath Jackson, Lt. Richard Hetrick, Wade L. Hartly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lynch v. Robertson et al
as 1:2022cv00341
Plaintiff:
Tavars D. Lynch and Tavars Dewayne Lynch
Defendant:
Barry E. Robertson, Matthew Wade, Eric Starr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bradford v. Wade (INMATE 2)
as 1:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
William Bradford
Defendant:
Matthew Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wade v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 4:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Heather Wade
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00551
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bradford v. Wade (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00816
Plaintiff:
William Clyde Bradford and William Bradford
Defendant:
Matthew Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
