Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-2016
Plaintiff:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Government of the Province of Manitoba, Canada
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Idaho and others
Defendant - Appellee:
States of Colorado, New Mexico, et al., Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and others
Defendant - Appellant:
South Florida Water Management District
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-1909
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as ADMINISTRATOR OF THE UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, City of New York and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of Denver, by and through its Board of Water Commissioners, Central Utah Water Conservancy District and others
Catskill Mountains Chapter of v. United States Environmental Pr
as 14-1823
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Catskill Mountains Chapter of Trout Unlimited, Inc., Theodore Gordon Flyfishers, Inc., Catskill-Deleware Natural Water Alliance, Inc. and others
Defendant:
State of Texas, State of Alaska, State of Idaho and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Stephen L. Johnson, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and South Florida Water Management District
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
States of Colorado, New Mexico, et al., Central Arizona Water Conservation District, City and County of San Francisco Public Utilities Commission and others
CASE OPENED IN ERROR
as 7:2013cv00199
Plaintiff:
Sierra Club, Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. and Cape Fear River Watch
Defendant:
Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
North Carolina Environmental Justice Network et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2012cv00154
Plaintiff:
North Carolina Environmental Justice Network , Neuse River Foundation, Inc. and Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc.
Defendant:
Taylor Finishing, Inc. , Donald Taylor , Frederick A. McLawhorn and others
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Gulf Restoration Network et al v. Jackson et al
as 2:2012cv00677
Plaintiff:
Gulf Restoration Network , Missouri Coalition for the Environment , Iowa Environmental Council and others
Defendant:
Lisa P. Jackson and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al v. Jackson et al
as 1:2012cv01848
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. , Missouri Coalition for the Environment , Gulf Restoration Network and others
Defendant:
Lisa P. Jackson and The United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Appalachian Voices, Inc. et al v. IGG Hazard, LLC et al
as 7:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Appalachian Voices, Inc. , Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. , Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc. and others
Defendant:
IGG Hazard, LLC, IGG Knott County, LLC and IGG East Kentucky, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Appalachian Voices, Inc. et al v. Frasure Creek Mining, LLC
as 7:2011cv00167
Plaintiff:
Appalachian Voices, Inc. , Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. , Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Frasure Creek Mining, LLC
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365
Appalachian Voices, Inc. et al v. Nally & Hamilton Enterprises, Inc.
as 6:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
Appalachian Voices, Inc. , Waterkeeper Alliance, Inc. , Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Nally & Hamilton Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
