Cases 41 - 50 of 933
Saddleback Exploration, LLC v. Brunelle et al
as 4:2023cv03091
Plaintiff:
Saddleback Exploration, LLC
Defendant:
Barbara Brunelle, Allen P. Wherry Revocable Trust, Betty Coole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Lampkin v. Cox et al
as 6:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Esaw Lampkin
Defendant:
Dannal Cox, R.S. Simmons, Ann Q. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fishinghawk v. Mooneyham
as 6:2023cv00561
Petitioner:
Evan C Fishinghawk
Respondent:
FNU Mooneyham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ehrlich v. Evans et al
as 5:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Desiree Ehrlich
Defendant:
Jeffrey O'Neal Evans and Tradition Transportation Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Kelso v. 3M Company et al
as 4:2023cv02690
Plaintiff:
Larry G Kelson and Larry G Kelso
Defendant:
3M Company, CHCA Pearland L.P. doing business as HCA Houston Healthcare Pearland, HCA Pearland GP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Williams v. Perryman et al
as 6:2023cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Defendant:
Judge Nancy Perryman, Judge Tony Duncan, Judge Scott McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Salazar
as 5:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
Delarick Evans
Defendant:
Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Evans v. Garza
as 1:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
Michelle Evans
Defendant:
Jose Garza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Evans v. Does 1-877
as 1:2023cv00722
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Evans
Defendant:
Does 1-877
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
