Cases 41 - 50 of 525
SMITH v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
TAMMY SMITH, GAYLORD STAUFFER, RONDA LOCKETT and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC, GLAXOSMITHKLINE (AMERICA) INC. and GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FERGUSON v. HOLLOMAN CORPORATION
as 2:2021cv01832
Plaintiff:
SETH FERGUSON
Defendant:
HOLLOMAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Forbes v. Kozich et al
as 3:2021cv02115
Plaintiff:
Jordan Forbes
Defendant:
C.O. Kozich, C.O. Erdman, C.O. Testen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOONE v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2021cv05365
Plaintiff:
LAMOUNT BOONE
Defendant:
PA.DOC SEC. JOHN WETZEL, TAMMY FERGUSON and SCI-MEDICAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HINES v. FERGUSON et al
as 2:2021cv05203
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HINES, III
Defendant:
TAMMY FERGUSON, MANDY SIPPLE, C.E.R.T. JOHN DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITFIELD v. ECHO GLOBAL LOGISTICS, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv04917
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW WHITFIELD
Defendant:
ECHO GLOBAL LOGISTICS, INC., DOUGLAS R WAGGONER, WILLIAM M FARROW, III and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
STRONG v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2021cv04652
Plaintiff:
LEONARD STRONG
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WARDEN CATHY TALMADGE, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MORRIS v. ZAKEN et al
as 2:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
DEREYK L MORRIS and DEREYK L. MORRIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL ZAKEN, DEPUTY STEPHEN BUZAS, CAPTAIN KENNEDY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
OLMO v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv04333
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL OLMO
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT TAMMY FERGUSON, WELLPATH, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASLEY v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
WARREN EASLEY
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, OBERLANDER, SARATELLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
