Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Mireskandari et al v. Lees et al
as 1:2016cv00211
Plaintiff:
Shahrokh Mireskandari and Paul Baxendale-Walker
Defendant:
Malcolm Sidney Lees, The Law Society in England and Wales, The Solicitors Regulation Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Dickson v. U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
John M. Dickson, Jr.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mrs. Loretta E. Lynch, Mr. Eric Holder Former Attorney General of the U.S.A. of Covington & Burling LLP, U.S. Dept of Justice U.S. Attorney Eastern District, Virginia Mr. Dana J. Boente and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Townsend v. Johnson
as 1:2015cv00059
Plaintiff:
Valerie R. Townsend
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Townsend v. Colvin
as 2:2014cv00403
Plaintiff:
Cornelious Townsend
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Albritton v. Snead et al
as 3:2014cv00558
Plaintiff:
Morris Albritton
Defendant:
S. Snead, Whitlow, J. Townsend and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Branch Banking & Trust Company et al
as 1:2014cv00094
Plaintiff:
Frederick P. Thomas
Defendant:
Branch Banking & Trust Company and Tina R. Townsend
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Townsend v. Director of Department of Corr
as 2:2013cv00692
Petitioner:
Antonio J. Townsend
Respondent:
Director of Department of Corr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Townsend v. Clarke
as 1:2013cv01240
Petitioner:
Micheal Lee Townsend
Respondent:
Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Zargarpur v. Townsend et al
as 1:2013cv01022
Plaintiff:
Mattin Zargarpur
Defendant:
Dennis Townsend , Danny White , Ron Cavanaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Townsend v. Clarke
as 2:2013cv00341
Petitioner:
Antonio J. Townsend
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
