Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUMPHREYS v. WYNDAM VACATION OWNERSHIP, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv00495
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA HUMPHREYS
Defendant:
WYNDAM VACATION OWNERSHIP, INC. , JANE DOE I-V and XYZ CORPORATION I-V
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv05708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GARRITON v. SYMPHONY HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2015cv02004
Plaintiff:
GREER GARRITON
Defendant:
SYMPHONY HEALTH SOLUTIONS CORPORATION , JANE DOE I-V, JOHN DOE I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
MELENDEZ v. COLORITE PLASTICS COMPANY et al
as 2:2015cv01931
Plaintiff:
RAMOND MELENDEZ
Defendant:
COLORITE PLASTICS COMPANY , PLASTIC SPECIALTIES AND TECHNOLOGIES, INC. , TEKNI-PLEX, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01841
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv04529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
RODRIGUEZ v. CAPUTO et al
as 2:2013cv00040
Plaintiff:
CARLOS VILLA RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
LOUIS J. CAPUTO, JR, JEFFREY D. GUEST, CAPUTO & GUEST MUSHROOMS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MELBER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv03510
Plaintiff:
ROBERT MELBER
Defendant:
NEELAKSHI BHAGAT, M.D. , AMIR COHEN, MD. , JOHN DOE,M.D. I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
