Cases 41 - 50 of 337
Perry v. Saul
as 3:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Lassandra Perry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Moody v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00050
Plaintiff:
Ryan Perry Moody
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Saquing v. Mallett et al
as 3:2020cv00182
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Ronald Ellzy Woodall, Wexler Medical and others
Plaintiff:
John Milton Saquing
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jobe v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2020cv00039
Defendant:
Stephen Wheeler, Gloria Perry, Juan Santos and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Jobe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harris v. Anthony, et al
as 3:2020cv00120
Defendant:
Dr. Dwalia S. South, Dr. Thad Waites, Wheeler Timothy Timbs, III and others
Plaintiff:
Donna Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lang et al v. Taylor et al
as 4:2020cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bobby Mitchell, Charlie Harris, Alexander Jones and others
Defendant:
Wendall Banks, Centurion of Mississippi, LLC, Brenda S. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Comeaux et al v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv00057
Defendant:
ETI, Inc. and Randal Wade Moore
Plaintiff:
Mallory Comeaux and John Perry Comeaux
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gilleo v. Hall et al
as 3:2019cv00891
Defendant:
Warden Unknown Banks, Deputy Warden James Fillyaw, Pelicia Hall and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Gilleo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Long v. Hall et al
as 3:2019cv00890
Defendant:
Gloria Perry, Warden Unknown Banks, Deputy Warden James Fillyaw and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
James Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holloway v. Hall et al
as 3:2019cv00889
Defendant:
ARP Director Richard Pennington, Investigator of ARP Raniece Matthews, Warden Unknown Banks and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jason Holloway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
