Cases 41 - 50 of 52,953
Colliver v. Pettigrew
as 4:2024cv00198
Petitioner:
Erich Dwayne Colliver
Respondent:
Luke Pettigrew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moss v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Don Moss
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Holz v. LNU et al
as 5:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holz v. Katterhenry
as 5:2024cv00436
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Dan Katterhenry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Holz v. Linsay
as 5:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
Timothy Edward Holz
Defendant:
Terry Linsay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnett v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Christopher J Barnett
Respondent:
Cynthia Smith, Carrie Bridges and John Masquelier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coomes v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
Colin Coomes
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
United States of America et al v. Joint Technology, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
United States of America, Reynaldo Solano, California State Of and others
Defendant:
Joint Technology Inc doing business as Revert Systems, Jim Patton, Dr. John Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Livingston v. Regalado et al
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Aaron J Livingston also known as Aaron J Clarke doing business as Gtwo, Aaron J Clarke, Aaron J Livingston also known as Clarke doing business as Gtwo and others
Defendant:
Vic Regalado, Tulsa County Sheriff's Office, Jared Daniel Bakker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
