Cases 41 - 50 of 6,807
Curry v. Kirkland Corr. Ins/ State of South Carolina
as 0:2024cv01674
Petitioner:
Jerome Curry and (Flesh And Blood Man)
Respondent:
Kirkland Corr. Ins/ South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bedford v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024cv01680
Petitioner:
Emanual Aurmond Bedford
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stroman v. Calhoun County Sheriffs Department et al
as 1:2024cv00698
Petitioner:
Shaneeka Stroman
Respondent:
Calhoun County Sheriffs Department and St. Matthews Magistrate Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Richman v. Graham
as 9:2024cv01635
Petitioner:
Ulysses Richman
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2024cv01623
Petitioner:
Mickey Markell Johnson
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hosley v. Jansen
as 1:2024cv01621
Petitioner:
Otis Hosley
Respondent:
Warden Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beeman v. Janson
as 5:2024cv01622
Petitioner:
Michael Steven Beeman
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bogan v. Warden FCI Edgefield
as 5:2024cv01624
Petitioner:
Clarence Bogan
Respondent:
Warden FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dunn v. Janson
as 6:2024cv01544
Petitioner:
George Washington Dunn
Respondent:
Sean Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hunter v. Stirling et al
as 4:2024cv00547
Petitioner:
Troy Darnell Hunter
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling and Levern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
