Cases 41 - 50 of 429,340
BROWN v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
EDWARD LEE BROWN
Respondent:
ASHLEY MOODY and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
FREDERICK v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
JOHN HENRY FREDERICK, SR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA and LIBERTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GUTHRIE v. MCCALLUM et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE GUTHRIE
Defendant:
BOBBY MCCALLUM, GERARD WILLIAMS and SAM QUINCEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
JACKSON v. UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE et al
as 3:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
ROY WAYNE JACKSON, JR
Defendant:
UNKNOWN MAKER OF ZANTAC RANITIDINE, CMC PHARMACY and UNIVERSITY TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC v. DOE
as 5:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
HART v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
G ENGLISH and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BALL v. DOES 1-X et al
as 4:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
DENNIS ANDREW BALL
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-X, JANE DOES 1-X, ABC CORPORATIONS 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
