Cases 41 - 50 of 30,364
BOYKINS v. GILBERT et al
as 1:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
MAURICE BOYKINS
Defendant:
GILBERT, GORD, UNIT TEAM MANAGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PERDUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY K. PERDUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
JOHN ERIC THOMAS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORESTAL, F. EMI and JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Bridegroom et al
as 3:2024cv00339
Plaintiff:
Aaron Christopher Massey
Defendant:
Nichole Bridegroom, James Jackson and John Galipeau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Elkhart County Indiana et al
as 3:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Elkhart County Indiana, Elkhart County Court, Stephen R. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00212
Petitioner:
Michael D. Carter, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BYRNE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00431
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER C. BYRNE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armour v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00356
Petitioner:
Rickey R Armour
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Morales
as 3:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Billy Williams
Defendant:
Morales
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
