Cases 51 - 60 of 261
Grant v. Esper et al
as 1:2021cv00328
Defendant:
Mark Thomas Esper, James N. Mattis, Joseph F. Dunford and others
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Grant II v. Dunford, Jr et al
as 1:2021cv00329
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant II
Defendant:
Joseph F. Dunford, Jr, William Pelham Barr and James A Baker III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
McElroy v. Clarke et al
as 7:2021cv00091
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, I.M.P. Sykes, Warden Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Carnell Dion McElroy and Carnell Dion McElroy, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Ross et al
as 1:2020cv01245
Defendant:
Wilbur L. Ross, Unknownemployees of the Dept of Commerce and/or USPTO and Andrei Iancu
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Ross et al
as 1:2020cv01367
Defendant:
Marlon T. Fletcher, Unknown employees of the Dept of Commerce and USPTO, Daniel Swerdlow and others
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker v. Saul
as 1:2020cv00056
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Tamara Dawn Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
XI Chi Clan Nation et al v. Barry, et al.
as 3:2020cv00739
Respondent:
Justin L. Krik, Esq., Bank of America, Office of the Sheriff and others
Claimant:
Guale Yamassee Juris Consul Office, Be Kind and Unified Foreign Private Family Indigenous Trust, Guale Yamassee Compliance Department and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
OctoInsight, Inc. v. Barker et al
as 1:2020cv01202
Defendant:
Jermey Andrew Charles Barker, James Smith and Jeremy Andrew Charles Baker
Plaintiff:
OctoInsight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodrigues v. Sizemore et al
as 7:2020cv00380
Defendant:
Baker and Sizemore
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rodrigues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Grant v. Baker et al
as 1:2020cv00887
Defendant:
James A. Baker, Office of the Secretary of Defense, State of Illinois and others
Plaintiff:
William Lee Grant, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
