Cases 51 - 60 of 95
Patterson v. United States of America
as 0:2014cv03392
Petitioner:
Michael Paul Patterson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Patterson v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2014cv02796
Plaintiff:
Adrian Patterson
Defendant:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv02774
Plaintiff:
Stacy Patterson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson v. Bank of America, National Association
as 0:2014cv00288
Plaintiff:
Judy Patterson
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Patterson et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 0:2013cv03480
Plaintiff:
Preston Patterson and Helen Patterson
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Electronic Funds Source LLC v. Easiley et al
as 0:2013cv02935
Defendant:
Gerard Montez Easiley, Stacey Lair Lee-Easiley, Dominick Sterlyn Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Electronic Funds Source LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lehman-Patterson v. Organon USA, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv01414
Plaintiff:
Christine Lehman-Patterson
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc. and Merck & Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lingitz v. Ramsey County et al
as 0:2013cv00582
Plaintiff:
Erwin Alfred Lingitz
Defendant:
Ramsey County , Daniel Eggers, Richard Werdien and others
Cross_claimant:
Twin City Lawmen, Inc. and Frank Patterson
Cross_defendant:
Twin City Lawmen, Inc. , John Doe, Daniel Eggers and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv03151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alexander et al v. Hawkins et al
as 0:2012cv03088
Plaintiff:
Donald Alexander, Gary Patterson and George Dalton
Defendant:
William A. Hawkins , Gary Ellis , Kathleen Erickson DiGiorno and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
