Cases 51 - 60 of 81
SCHERER et al v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 3:2016cv00232
Defendant:
AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN N. NEELY
Plaintiff:
THADDEUS A. SCHERER and SHANNON M. TANNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02366
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NEUENDORF v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2016cv01967
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
TANNER S. NEUENDORF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WARD v. TANNER et al
as 2:2016cv00274
Defendant:
"FREEBIRDS", JACK TANNER and VIGO COUNTY
Plaintiff:
DACIA NAKEMA WARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farm Credit Mid-America v. Schwartz
as 4:2015cv00058
Plaintiff:
Farm Credit Mid-America
Defendant:
Tanner Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tanner v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv00174
Petitioner:
Charles Tanner
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tanner et al v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00426
Plaintiff:
Carlton Tanner and Helena Tanner
Defendant:
Biomet Inc , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and Biomet Orthopedics LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES
as 1:2014cv00094
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICES, CORK, DANIELS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. UTAH VALLEY UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2013cv01650
Defendant:
DANIEL MCDONALD, GREG SCHWAB, RYAN TANNER and others
Plaintiff:
SEAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DOUGLAS v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 1:2013cv01351
Defendant:
CORIZON, INC., VANCE RAHAM and RICHARD TANNER
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DOUGLAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
