Cases 51 - 60 of 249
Sherman v. ConocoPhillips Company et al
as 5:2017cv01373
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Sherman
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company , Phillips 66 Co , John Dimond and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilkins v. Aberdeen Enterprizes II, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00606
Plaintiff:
Ira Lee Wilkins
Defendant:
Aberdeen Enterprizes II, Inc., Oklahoma Sheriffs'Association, The, Jason Ritchie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norrid et al v. Troxel et al
as 6:2017cv00401
Plaintiff:
Shane Norrid , Kermit Michael Troxel , Kevin Hartman and others
Defendant:
D.A.R.P., Inc., , Raymond Jones , Hendren Plastics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1595
Keller et al v. Krusmark et al
as 4:2017cv00545
Plaintiff:
Thomas Keller , Waynette Long and Robert Thomas
Defendant:
Tim Krusmark, Anthony DeCosmo, LaFarge North America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Barrios v. Haskell County Public Facilities Authority et al
as 6:2017cv00325
Plaintiff:
Jered Barrios
Defendant:
Haskell County Public Facilities Authority, Brian Hale, Katrina Christy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ealey v. Hiniger et al
as 6:2017cv00300
Plaintiff:
Antonio Rodriguez Ealey
Defendant:
Damon T. Hiniger, Core Civic, Inc., Robert Perry, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00727
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennett v. Garvin et al
as 6:2017cv00262
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mel Bennett
Defendant:
Jeremy Garvin, Tim Burgess and Christian Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
