Cases 51 - 60 of 109
Gonzalez v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2014cv00612
Plaintiff:
Benjamin J Gonzalez
Defendant:
State of New Mexico, Richard Van Dyk, Patrick M. Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ziehl v. Frawner et al
as 2:2014cv00432
Plaintiff:
Gary Duane Ziehl
Defendant:
James Frawner, FNU Velarde and M. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Favela-Gonzalez v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv00257
Petitioner:
Ernesto Favela-Gonzalez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sisneros v. Eason et al
as 2:2014cv00208
Plaintiff:
David Sisneros
Defendant:
Laurie Eason and L. Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marron v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2013cv00802
Plaintiff:
Larry Marron
Defendant:
Hellen Gonzalez and Town of Edgewood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
D.R. Horton, Inc. et al v. Angel, et al
as 1:2012cv01286
Defendant:
Ivelisse Cruz, Tracee Edwards, Edward Caulder and others
Plaintiff:
D.R. Horton, Inc. and DRH Southwest Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. 2008 Ford F350 Super Duty et al
as 1:2012cv00885
Defendant:
2008 Ford F350 Super Duty
Claimant:
Ramon O Gonzalez and Ford Motor Credit Company
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
United States of America v. 2008 Ford F250 Super Duty et al
as 1:2012cv00886
Defendant:
2008 Ford F250 Super Duty
Claimant:
Maria G Gonzalez , Ramon O Gonzalez and Ford Motor Credit Company
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Gonzalez v. Roark et al
as 1:2012cv00834
Plaintiff:
Shawn Anthony Gonzalez
Defendant:
Jerry Roark and James Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
