Cases 51 - 60 of 387
Dunn et al v. 2426498 Ontario, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dunn and Traci Dunn
Defendant:
2426498 Ontario, Inc. doing business as Brooks Transport Services and Hugo Orlando Gutierrez-Zorro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Brooks et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01643
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS and LATASHA BROOKS
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Eury v. Brooks et al
as 1:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Eury
Defendant:
Robert Brooks, Albert Thrower and Arthur Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Brooks v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv01060
Plaintiff:
Timothy Brooks
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curtis v. Sproul, et al.
as 4:2022cv00295
Plaintiff:
Courtney Curtis
Defendant:
Counselor Jarrett, Lt. Brooks, Ms. Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harless v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
Brook Harless
Defendant:
CR Bard Incorporated and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. $346,918.00 U.S. Currency
as 1:2022cv00096
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$346,918.00 U.S. Currency
Claimant:
Daniel Brooks
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Brooks v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05933
Plaintiff:
Jerome Brooks
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brooks v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05453
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Brooks
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
