Cases 51 - 60 of 1,374
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Butler v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv00455
Plaintiff:
Shaquan Butler, Robert L. Muray and Robert L. Murray
Defendant:
City of New York, 5 John Doe C.O., John Doe Capt. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00295
Plaintiff:
Liam Murray
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Murray v. OneTouchPoint, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Liam Murray
Defendant:
OneTouchPoint, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Bushansky v. Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10621
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Ayala Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Roni Mamluk, Murray A. Goldberg and others
Coffman v. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10305
Plaintiff:
Catherine Coffman
Defendant:
Oyster Point Pharma, Inc., Donald J. Santel, Jeffrey Nau and others
O'Dell v. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv10202
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
Oyster Point Pharma, Inc., Donald J. Santel, Jeffrey Nau, Ph.D. and others
Smith v. BTRS Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09808
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
BTRS Holdings Inc., Flint Lane, Robert Farrell and others
Murray v. Fricke et al
as 9:2022cv01189
Plaintiff:
Daniel Murray
Defendant:
Russell Fricke and Warren County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. Blinken et al
as 1:2022cv09714
Plaintiff:
Mark Rock Higgins, Higgins Family Trust d/b/a Mark Rock Higgins etc. and Mark Rock Higgins Estate, Beneficiary
Defendant:
Antony Blinken, Jeri L. Williams, Polk Sheila Sullivan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
