Cases 51 - 60 of 120
Scott et al v. The Cityof New York et al
as 1:2017cv01141
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrews, Diamante Jackson, Givon L. Jackson and others
Defendant:
Police Detective Sal Brajuha, Police Officer Grieco, John Doe #1-15 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McKinney v. Cohen et al
as 1:2017cv01381
Plaintiff:
Mark E. McKinney
Defendant:
Jonathan Z. Cohen , David J. Bryant , Eldron C. Blackwell and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
DeCaro v. Bryant et al
as 1:2017cv00474
Defendant:
David J. Bryant, Eldron C. Blackwell, David E. Bloom and others
Plaintiff:
James M. DeCaro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Canoles v. Resource Capital Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00349
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Canoles
Defendant:
Steven J. Kessler, Walter T. Beach, William B. Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 sv Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Greenberg v. Bryant et al
as 1:2017cv00253
Plaintiff:
Joseph Greenberg
Defendant:
David J. Bryant, Eldron C. Blackwell, David E. Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wiggins v. The Garden City Golf Club
as 2:2016cv05959
Defendant:
The Garden City Golf Club
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Slade v. State of New York et al
as 9:2016cv01106
Plaintiff:
Ricco Slade
Defendant:
State of New York, R. Wiggins, Ms. LaLiberte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Wilsey et al
as 9:2016cv01083
Plaintiff:
Frederick Dillon
Defendant:
M. Wilsey, Jane Doe and S. Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggins v. NYC Department of Corrections
as 1:2016cv06048
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Wiggins
Defendant:
NYC Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiggins v. Farrell et al
as 1:2016cv05495
Plaintiff:
Matthew Wiggins
Defendant:
James Farrell, Meagan Galligan, Susan Buckley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
