Cases 51 - 60 of 687
Solorio Reyes v. Garland
as 22-363
Petitioner:
KARLA SOLORIO REYES, RHIANNA ZARAGOZA and MARIA ZARAGOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Elias Zaragoza v. Garland
as 22-350
Petitioner:
FEDERICO ELIAS ZARAGOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramon Silva v. Rogelio Zaragoza
as 22-35078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMON SAUL SILVA
Defendant / Appellee:
ROGELIO ZARAGOZA, Doctor, Western State Hospital
Isaac Rodriguez v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 22-15085
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ISAAC JUDE RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director, HACKER-AGNEW, Named as Ms. Hacker, Former Complex Warden at ASPC Yuma, ZARAGOZA, Named as Mr. Zaragoza, Former Deputy Warden at ASPC Yuma and others
Gilberto Fuentes Zaragoza v. On Habeas Corpus
as 8:2021cv02091
Petitioner:
Gilberto Fuentes Zaragoza
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Zaragoza v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2021cv01775
Petitioner:
Gilberto Fuentes Zaragoza
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bueno Zaragoza v. Lynch et al
as 2:2021at01176
Plaintiff:
Ma Rosario Bueno Zaragoza
Defendant:
(warden) Jeffrey W Lynch and DOES 1 through 30
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bueno Zaragoza v. Lynch
as 2:2021cv02294
Plaintiff:
Ma Rosario Bueno Zaragoza and Estate of Luis Giovanny Aguilar
Defendant:
Jeffrey W. Lynch, Daniel Garland, Marcus Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rios v. Contra Costa Sheriff's Department
as 5:2021cv09465
Plaintiff:
Eric Zaragoza Rios
Defendant:
Contra Costa Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Manning v. Governor's Place Condominium Association et al
as 1:2021cv03186
Plaintiff:
Sitges Manning
Defendant:
Governor's Place Condominium Association, Advance HOA Management, Inc., Orten Cavanagh Holmes and Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
