Cases 51 - 60 of 285
Rayner v. Anderson et al
as 1:2020cv00089
Defendant:
David M. Anderson and John Doe Employer
Plaintiff:
Johnny W. Rayner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 md
Anderson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020cv00159
Defendant:
Wound Care Tech Young, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Dr. T. Adams
Plaintiff:
Trevor Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Tri-County Pharmacy et al v. Benzer KY-1, LLC et al
as 7:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Alpesh Patel, Benzer Pharmacy Holding, LLC, Benzer KY-1, LLC and others
Counter Defendant:
Lillian Caniece Haywood and William James Thomas
Plaintiff:
Tri-County Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Anderson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020cv00118
Defendant:
Young, Federal Bureau of Prisons and Dr. T. Adams
Plaintiff:
Trevor Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson, et al. v. Lowe's Companies, Inc., et al.
as 3:2020cv00189
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc, Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
Plaintiff:
Anderson, Anna Maria Cruz and Ronald Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Green et al v. Genova Products, Inc.
as 5:2020cv00025
Plaintiff:
Marie Green, Buffy Timmons, Seth Rottgering and others
Defendant:
Genova Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2101
Anderson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2020cv00005
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mrs. Young and Dr. T. Adams
Plaintiff:
Trevor Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 wt
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
