Cases 51 - 60 of 109
ORTIZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv02940
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ORTIZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Angel Ortiz, et al v. Jerre Riggle, et al
as 16-3465
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ORTIZ
Plaintiff - Appellant:
AO CONSTRUCTION AND RESTORATION, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
JERRE RIGGLE and BRICKLAYERS LOCAL NO. 8
Angel Ortiz Diamond v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv07064
Respondent:
City of Los Angeles, MacDonald and William Peterson
Petitioner:
Angel Ortiz Diamond, II
Angel Ortiz Diamond v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2015cv06493
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Clark Family Company, County of Los Angeles and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz Diamond, II
Angel Ortiz Diamond v. Clark Family Company et al
as 2:2015cv05676
Defendant:
Brian Clark, Joan Clark, Clark Family Company and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz Diamond
Diamond v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 3:2015cv03291
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz Diamond, II
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, County of Los Angeles, MacDonald Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Diamond v. Clark Family Company et al
as 3:2015cv03152
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz Diamond
Defendant:
Clark Family Company, Joan Clark, Brian Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diamond v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 3:2015cv03153
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz Diamond, II
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, William Peterson and MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Roseann Barnett et al v. Food Management Partners, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03140
Plaintiff:
Roseann Barnett, Gary Bowles, Onesimo Cantoran and others
Defendant:
Catalina Restaurant Group, Inc., Does and Food Management Partners, Inc.
Ortiz et al v. Naya Express Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03054
Plaintiff:
Angel Ortiz , Arturo Yanez , Santiago Galvez and others
Defendant:
Naya Express Inc. , Naya Express II Inc. and Hady Kfoury
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
