Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Anthony Kelly v. State of Maryland
as 08-6038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, MARYLAND STATE TREASURER, EDWARD WHITFIELD, Social Worker and others
Kelly v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2007cv03254
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kelly
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Sheilah Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. State Of Maryland
as 8:2007cv03105
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kelly
Defendant:
State Of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2007cv03061
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kelly
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Maryland State Treasurer, Edward Whitfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. State Of Maryland et al
as 8:2007cv03017
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kelly
Defendant:
State Of Maryland, Kathleen Reedy and Timothy Gipson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. State Of Maryland et al
as 8:2007cv03016
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kelly
Defendant:
State Of Maryland and Sheilah Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2007cv02995
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kelly
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Sheilah Davenport and Charles A. English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2007cv02994
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kelly
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Melvin Lanier, Maurice L. Mays and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. State of Maryland
as 07-7576
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MARYLAND, ROBERT WISNER-CARLSON, Acting Clinical Director and CLIFTON T. PERKINS HOSPITAL CENTER
Kelly v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2007cv02756
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kelly
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Sheilah Davenport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
