Cases 51 - 60 of 83
Rowland v. Aramark Food Services et al
as 2:2015cv02714
Plaintiff:
Johnny Rowland
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services and Hayslett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Shelby County Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv02618
Plaintiff:
Douglas Martinez
Defendant:
Shelby County Division of Corrections, William Gupton, Spears and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benson v. Unknown Agents of Aramark Food Services for the S.C.C.J.C. et al
as 2:2015cv02518
Plaintiff:
Ricky Benson
Defendant:
Unknown Agents of Aramark Food Services for the S.C.C.J.C., Echols, Townsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Anderson v. Moore et al
as 2:2014cv02778
Plaintiff:
Armando Q. Anderson
Defendant:
Robert Moore, Oldham, Haselett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beene v. Aramark Educational Services, LLC
as 3:2014cv01850
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Beene
Defendant:
Aramark Educational Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shelby County, TN Justice Commission & Court Administrations et al v. Bey
as 2:2014cv02334
Plaintiff:
Shelby County, TN Justice Commission & Court Administrations, Lee Coffrey, Earnestine Dorsey and others
Defendant:
Maleik Ali Bey
Miscellaneou:
Kevin Key
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2014cv02295
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Jones, III
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of TN, Shelby County D.A. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Aramark Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00261
Plaintiff:
Ashley Blake Mullins
Defendant:
Aramark Services, Inc. and Lloyd Vernon Ball
Counter_claimant:
Lloyd Vernon Ball and Aramark Services, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Ashley Blake Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Keen v. Aramark
as 2:2012cv02650
Plaintiff:
Terry Keen
Defendant:
Aramark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
