Cases 51 - 60 of 136
Williams v. Santa Cruz, et al
as 1:2003cv06048
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Williams
Defendant:
A Santa Cruz , Derrel Adams and Edward S. Alameida, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chatman v. Felker, et al
as 2:2003cv02415
Plaintiff:
Charles James Chatman
Defendant:
T. Felker, Edward S. Alameida, Jr., Richard W. Sandham and others
Respondent:
Linda Rianda, Robert Presley, N. Grannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Binh Vo v. Edward Alameida, Jr.
as 10-70412
Petitioner:
BINH THAI VO
Respondent:
EDWARD S. ALAMEIDA, Jr.
Chatman v. Tyner, et al
as 1:2003cv06636
Plaintiff:
Charles James Chatman
Defendant:
C Tyner , - Alameida, K W Prunty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jameson v. Rawers, et al., et al
as 1:2003cv05593
Plaintiff:
Barry S Jameson
Defendant:
Scott P Rawers , Edward S. Alameida, Jr. , E Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MaGee v. Bravo, et al
as 1:2003cv06764
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
D Bravo, A. Scribner, E. S. Alameida, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wohl v. Davis, et al
as 1:2003cv06921
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Wohl
Defendant:
Gray Davis, Edward S. Alameida, Jr., Richard E Early and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Du Pree v. Jennie Woodford et al
as 2:2004cv03484
Defendant:
Edward Alameida, A Attagalla, R Beltran and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Du Pree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ernesto Lira v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 09-17446
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ERNESTO G. LIRA
Defendant:
HERRERA, Lt., FIELDER, M. PILAND and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of CDCR
Khairy Aref v. Roderick Hickman, et al
as 09-56664
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHAIRY AREF
Defendant - Appellee:
RODERICK Q. HICKMAN, JEANNIE S. WOODFORD, CHARLES MICHAEL HARRISON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
