Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Spirit Airlines, Inc. v. 24/7 Real Media, Inc. et al
as 0:2007cv60399
Plaintiff:
Spirit Airlines, Inc., Spirit Airlines, Inc. and Spirit Airlines, Inc.
Defendant:
24/7 Real Media, Inc., Advertising.com, Inc., America Online, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Echo Target, Inc. and Priceline.com, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Echo Target, Inc. and Spirit Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00201
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hodge et al v. AOL Online, Inc. et al
as 8:2007cv00204
Plaintiff:
Chante' Hodge and Harold H. Hodge, Jr.
Defendant:
America Online, Inc., America Online, Inc., Randy Falco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007mc00012
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Bankruptcy Appeal from Judgment/Order
WINDY CITY V AMERICA ONLINE
as 06-1454
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
America Online, Inc. (now known as AOL LLC)
Plaintiff-Appellant:
Windy City Innovations, LLC
WINDY CITY V AMERICA ONLINE
as 06-1189
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
AMERICA ONLINE, INC., AMERICA ONLINE, INC. and AMERICA ONLINE, INC.
WINDY CITY V AMERICA ONLINE
as 06-1165
Defendant/Cross Appellant:
AMERICA ONLINE, INC., AMERICA ONLINE, INC. and AMERICA ONLINE, INC.
Plaintiff-Appellant:
WINDY CITY INNOVATIONS, LLC, WINDY CITY INNOVATIONS, LLC and WINDY CITY INNOVATIONS, LLC
Dreiling v. America Online Inc et al
as 2:2005cv01339
Plaintiff:
Thomas R Dreiling
Defendant:
America Online Inc and InfoSpace Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
AMERICA ONLINE V US
as 05-5138
Claimant-Appellee:
AMERICA ONLINE, INC.
Defendant-Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
