Cases 51 - 60 of 191
MITCHELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv61673
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMAS MITCHELL
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TYLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv58467
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMAS TYLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv51697
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PIET v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33339
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMAS PIET
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRUNELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27556
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMAS BRUNELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MOHS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv22785
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMAS MOHS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv04515
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earnest #056363 v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv05690
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Phoenix Police Department, Tony Colon and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Earnest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Andrew Swager
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 19-30198
Defendant / Appellant:
ANDREW THOMAS SWAGER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.