Cases 51 - 60 of 65
THOMPKINS v. ATKINS
as 3:2012cv01338
Plaintiff:
BEVERLY THOMPKINS
Defendant:
HASSAN ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ZARTIN v. BALIGA et al
as 2:2011cv06929
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH T. ZARTIN
Defendant:
RAVI BALIGA, CAROLYN FARRALES, LUNA HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANQUAH et al v. UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY (UMDNJ) et al
as 2:2011cv06377
Plaintiff:
SHARON L DANQUAH , BERYL OTIENO-NGOJE , JACQUELINE DESEO and others
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND DENTISTRY OF NEW JERSEY (UMDNJ) , BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF UMDNJ, JAMES GONZALEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
APEX MORTGAGE CORP. v. ATKINS et al
as 2:2011cv00334
Plaintiff:
APEX MORTGAGE CORP.
Defendant:
HARRIET ATKINS, KA-NOT TAVERN, INC. and AND UNKNOWN TENANTS/OCCUPANTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
ATKINS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv00323
Plaintiff:
SHERRY ATKINS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ATKIN v. UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
as 2:2010cv06487
Plaintiff:
EDWARD P. ATKIN
Defendant:
UNION COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GONZALEZ et al v. ATKINS et al
as 2:2010cv01189
Plaintiff:
JORGE R. GONZALEZ and CHANTILLY GONZALEZ
Defendant:
BENJAMIN THOMAS ATKINS , "JOHN DOE 1-5, CENTRAL CAROLINA CARRIERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
MCDOUGALD v. SMITH et al
as 3:2009cv04248
Plaintiff:
STEPHANIE MCDOUGALD
Defendant:
M. SMITH, B. PITTMAN and A. ATKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WAHEED v. ATKINS
as 2:2009cv00467
Plaintiff:
BAKIRAH WAHEED
Defendant:
A. ATKINS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
