Cases 51 - 60 of 254
R. v. Board Of Education Of The City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv08145
Defendant:
Legal Prep Charter Academies, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO and Jamel M. Helaire-Jones
Plaintiff:
J. R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Board of Education of the City of Chicago, School District No. 299 v. Cephalon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019op46042
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The Board of Education of the City of Chicago, School District No. 299
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Dan Williams v. Board of Education of the City
as 19-3152
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAN WILLIAMS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv06545
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pinkston v. The Board of Education of the City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv06477
Defendant:
Cynthia Miller, City Of Chicago, Maurice Polk and others
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Pinkston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tamika Graham v. Board of Education of the City, et al
as 19-2745
Defendant / Appellee:
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO and HEALTH CARE SERVICE CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAMIKA GRAHAM
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05809
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Agbefe v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago
as 1:2019cv04397
Defendant:
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO
Plaintiff:
Doris Agbefe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.